Good evening ... is it true that Garmin's algorithm recognizes if the increase in heart rate is due to stress or anxiety, or if it is due to more intense activities (not necessarily sport)?
Good evening ... is it true that Garmin's algorithm recognizes if the increase in heart rate is due to stress or anxiety, or if it is due to more intense activities (not necessarily sport)?
t's just that sometimes the heart rate is higher and consequently the calories are higher for the same activities
Could be simply higher because of higher effort, or because of rushing more, hence burning more energy, or because your HR is elevated due to the workout the day before (so called EPOC).
... and BTW, stress leads to faster Calorie burn anyway. Not telling that it is the right way to go, but it is so. (read about it for example here: www.medicalnewstoday.com/.../stress-weight-loss)
So, if the Firstbeat algorithms differentiate between the stress and sport, it does not mean the faster metabolism iduced by stress is completely ignored, and not taken in account.
If that calorie count is what the website says, I wouldn't trust anything else it says either. A calorie burn like that reflects an active period. In fact, many less fit people cannot sustain such a level of calorie burn for even an hour.
What could have happened .... fenix error?
Not sure what you mean. I see a very strong peek of stress at the wake up time, that can very well add those 63 Calories (the resting 543 Calories are just the Resting Metabolic Rate). Seems credible to me.
but I did not do any activity to justify a calorie consumption of 63 calories.
Stress alone can consume that many Calories easily