Does the Etrex Touch 35 respect shaping points? How do I accomplish this simple task?

Former Member
Former Member
Hi, I'm a newcomer to the Garmin line, and I just bought an Etrex Touch 35, primarily to handhold while hiking. (I'll save my rant about how buggy it currently is for another post...I was warned about the dangers of being an early adopter, but I didn't listen.) My main purpose is to plot out my desired hiking path in Basecamp as a route, no matter how curvy and complex, and to transfer that route to my device and use it for navigation in the field. These hiking paths I'm creating are usually off-road, and not automatically routable, so I often use the "Direct Routing" profile and use many points to shape my route. For the most part, I have been successful. I either create the route by manually inputting points on the Basecamp map, or I create a track by dragging the pointer around the map and then let Basecamp convert that track to a route. And for the most part, I can usually get that route to show up on my Etrex Touch 35 unchanged. That's not the problem.

What I have NOT been able to figure out is this...I would like to accomplish this simple task, which seems natural for a hiker. I would like to create and shape my route with many points in Basecamp...I would like almost all of the points to be shaping points...I would like to edit, say, one point in the middle to be a regular via point and change the name of that point to, say, "Scenic Vista." Then, after transferring that route to my device, and while hiking that route with my Etrex Touch 35, I would like the route to follow the path as it was shaped in Basecamp, obeying the shaping points...But I would like the shaping points NOT to show up as blue pins all over the map, NOT to pop up in the guidance window on the map screen when navigating, NOT to be listed in the Active Route application, and NOT to be used for calculating Trip Computer data fields such as Distance to Next, Time to Next, ETA at Next, etc.

In other words, what I WOULD like to see when navigating this route is...I would like to look at the map of my route and only see icons for the starting point, the "Scenic Vista," and the ending point, but the shape of the route should still follow the shaping points...I would like the Active Route app to list just the starting point, the Scenic Vista, and the ending point (with distance to each), and the data field for Distance to Next should show my distance to the next regular via point, like the Scenic Vista, not the distance to the next shaping point.

I know I'm a beginner, so maybe this is a question everyone already knows the answer to, but two points are worth making:

1) Can I do this? If I can't do this, it seems absurd, because it's such a natural concept for a hiker who's using this device as a hiking GPS. The whole point of hiking off-road is to plot routes across the land and be able to shape that route as I wish. Usually the foot-paths I'll be following are not on the map, and sometimes there's no footpath at all, so the route is entirely in my hands when creating it in Basecamp. That means I'm going to end up with a lot of shaping points. Yes, the Etrex will follow the route, but what a mess it becomes if every shaping point becomes a normal via point after transfer! Data fields like "Distance to Next" are just going to keep calculating the distance to each and every shaping point along the way?? I may have 100 shaping points along the route! And if I select Active Route, I don't want to see all 100 shaping points! Holy mackerel!

2) What's curious is that I can almost accomplish this by creating a Track instead of a Route in Basecamp, transfer the Track (not the Route), and then navigate to the Track (instead of to a Route) on my device. Interestingly, I create my curvy, complex track in Basecamp...I transfer the track to my device...On my device, I select Where To? and I select the new track. Now, the Etrex appears to create a route from the track and overlays a magenta line on the map as the route. The route follows my desired path exactly...And what surprised me is that if I go to Active Route, the ONLY points shown are Starting Point, Ending Point, and then a couple of new points that the Etrex seems to gave generated on its own, namely High Point and Low Point (for the highest and lowest elevation points on the route). Sometimes, if the track goes up and down in elevation multiple times, the new route will include several new points labeled High Point, Low Point, High Point, etc. These are points I never had a hand in marking or creating myself. And, if I had previously loaded a Waypoint or two on the device which the track happens to cross, then the newly calculated route would also include those Waypoints as points in the Active Route (even though I had no hand in inserting those Waypoints into the route...the Etrex did it itself). Furthermore, these points and ONLY these points (Starting Point, High Point, Low Point, Ending Point, and possibly a Waypoint here or there) are the only points that show up on the Route map, they are the ONLY points that show up in Active Route, and my data field "Distance to Next" always shows my the distance to the next one of these points only. I'm not an expert, but I assume that the shaping points are still in the new route somewhere, because the path is shaped the way I want, but if they are there, I can't see them anymore, anywhere. That part is great. The reason why this method is not ideal for me is that after this route is created in this way on the device, I cannot edit the route (i.e. I cannot add a via point for a Scenic Vista, I cannot remove an undesirable marked point such as "High Point" if I don't want it, etc.) I appear to be stuck with whatever "points" the device has attributed to my Active Route. I could create a Waypoint for the Scenic Vista, have the device navigate to the track again, and hope that the Etrex includes the Scenic Vista in my new route, but if I end up with two High Points and one Low Point that I really don't care about, I have no control over that.

It seems like it should be possible to create the route the way I'm describing in Basecamp and have it appear correctly on my Etrex Touch 35. The fact that the Etrex can create a route from a track itself (with Where To? and then choosing a track), and maintain the desired curvy shape of the route but show only a few points (instead of dozens of shaping points), suggests to me that the device is capable of following shaping points without displaying them. I used this method just yesterday while hiking off-road through the woods (no foot-path)...I created the track in Basecamp, transferred to my device, used Where To? and selected the track on my device...The route created by the device was perfect, and as I walked the route, the Etrex compass constantly pointed me in the right direction along all the twists and turns of my route through the woods, even though I never once saw a "via point" on the map or in the Active Route list other than High Point, for example. But again, I had no control over adding or subtracting via points from the route the device generated.

Basically, all I want is that when my friend says, "Hey, how long until we get to the Scenic Vista?" (which is not my final destination), I should be able to look at my Trip Computer data field for "Distance to Next" and see the answer, as long as the Scenic Vista is the next major via point, without being distracted by dozens of shaping points or device-generated High Points and Low Points. (I also hope that the Distance to Next field would show the distance I'll travel along the route to my next via point, and not the straight-line distance which is irrelevant to me.)

Thank you so much for your time and help. I am so grateful to have found this forum...Trying to figure out the learning curve for these Garmin devices as a beginner has been extremely difficult. I sincerely appreciate your time in reading this long post.

- Dave
  • Basically what you're suggesting isn't possible, and as a hiker who has used Garmin GPS for years I'm not sure why you wish to do what you're suggesting.

    What you can do is use a track, and as you say your Etrex, as do many of the later GPS, use a special way of doing so, see here

    http://gpstracklog.com/2010/07/navigating-tracks-on-the-new-garmin-handhelds.html

    You can of course always load waypoints to your Etrex should you wish to have special points to remind you of 'Scenic vista' etc.

    There are also ways to remove the rather annoying 'blue pins', see here

    https://forums.garmin.com/showthread.php?35618-GPSMAP-60CS-screen-cluttered-by-route-point-labels
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 9 years ago
    Thank you, SUSSAMB, for your amazingly quick and informed response. I must say, that method of transferring a track to the device and then navigating to the track feels a bit "loose" because I don't get to choose which Waypoints will become points in my Active Route list (which effect data fields such as "Distance to Next") and which ones won't. And, I don't get to eliminate any of those points afterwards, once the navigation has begun, right? So it's just whichever Waypoints on the map happen to lie in the path of the track, those Waypoints will all indiscriminately be integrated into the new route when navigating to the track? It's not that I want the shape of the path to change, but what if I don't want all those waypoints showing up in my active route list today? What if I have 10 Waypoints on the map that the track happens to pass through, but I'm only going to stop at one of them today? What if I'm planning a 12-hour hike and the track I've created in Basecamp would pass through 100 Waypoints I had previously marked on my device (but only one or some of which are relevant today)? When I navigate to the track, will I have no choice but to accept all these Waypoints completely integrated into the route as via points that I don't want, which will interfere with my Active Route list and my data fields? Shouldn't I have some control over eliminating these waypoints from the route? It all feels so loose and offers the user so little control. Is my only option with this method to literally erase the Waypoints off the device if I don't want them showing up as via points in the route, and then replacing them afterward?

    Along the same lines, when I navigate to a track, the new route includes the High Point and the Low Point as via points in the route. What if I don't want these interfering with the Waypoints I've laid along the track, and I want to eliminate them from the list? These High Points and Low Points also interfere with data fields like "Distance to Next," and they're also pretty useless if the track is mostly flat.

    Most of all, does the user just have no firm control over this? If my desire seems picky, it's just in an effort to customize my routing preferences to my liking. If my next important Waypoint is the Scenic Vista, it's annoying to look at my Trip Computer and see "Distance to Next" showing me the distance to some High Point that I don't care about but have no ability to eliminate.

    Thanks again,
    Dave
  • In other words, what I WOULD like to see when navigating this route is...I would like to look at the map of my route and only see icons for the starting point, the "Scenic Vista," and the ending point, but the shape of the route should still follow the shaping points...I would like the Active Route app to list just the starting point, the Scenic Vista, and the ending point (with distance to each), and the data field for Distance to Next should show my distance to the next regular via point, like the Scenic Vista, not the distance to the next shaping point.


    The Garmin Edges allows you to do this.

    The Edge units use track (not route) files for navigation. They can also use something called "course points" through using a "tcx" file. They are sort-of like waypoints but are part of the track data.

    Course points are a separate list of special points, each of which corrresponds to a track point. The course points are displayed on the map as an icon and a short label. When you get near a course point, a pop-up appears on the screen showing the icon and the label.

    The Edges also show a list of course points and the distance to them.





    Some of the Edges, like the 500, don't have maps. Course points can be used as a "primative" form of turn guidance (the icon displays the direction to turn and the label is the street name).

    Basically, all I want is that when my friend says, "Hey, how long until we get to the Scenic Vista?" (which is not my final destination), I should be able to look at my Trip Computer data field for "Distance to Next" and see the answer,...

    I can do exactly this on my Edge (using course points).

    Basecamp doesn't allow you to create course points (ridewithgps does).

    Thank you, SUSSAMB, for your amazingly quick and informed response. I must say, that method of transferring a track to the device and then navigating to the track feels a bit "loose" because I don't get to choose which Waypoints will become points in my Active Route list (which effect data fields such as "Distance to Next") and which ones won't. And, I don't get to eliminate any of those points afterwards, once the navigation has begun, right?

    A "track" is a set of points that describes the path you intend to travel. "Waypoints" are just special points. They aren't related to the track (though they can happen to be on the track). You can get the distance to a particular waypoint but it's the direct distance (as far as I understand). You can also have the unit calculate a route to the waypoint.

    "Course points" are like waypoints that are related to the track. The distance to a course point indicated on the Edges is the path distance (not the direct distance).
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 9 years ago
    I see. I think on the Etrex Touch 35, when you navigate to a track, if a Waypoint on the map happens to lie in the path of the track, then when you navigate (using Where To?) to the track, a route is generated, and those Waypoints become "swept up" and integrated into the route itself, becoming like via points (virtually like the course points you describe), and the distance to each Waypoint in the Active Route list is the correct path distance along the route. (I think that's right...It would be even more ridiculous if the Waypoints which become a part of my route in this way are shown with straight-like distances in the Active Route app instead of path distances!)

    What bothers me with this method is that I have no control over which Waypoints get swept up and become part of the Active Route list before the route is generated (short of deleting the Waypoints from the device), and I have no control over eliminating undesirable Waypoints from the Active Route list after the route is generated either (again, short of deleting the Waypoints from the device). And, points for High Point and Low Point are added to the Active Route list automatically, which alter my waypoint data fields (Distance to Next, etc.), and I have no option to remove them.

    Some people may say, what's wrong with having extra Waypoints in your route, or High Point, or Low Point, as long as your path is shaped the way you want and you end up at your destination? But Waypoints aren't just to point me in the right direction. If I have a data field for "ETA at Next," that data field becomes useless if I have Waypoints that I don't care about cluttering my route (even an innocent addition like High Point still throws off data fields that refer to the next Waypoint, if the High Point comes before the next Waypoint I actually care about).

    - Dave
  • 4163

    No offense, but you seem to be asking Garmin to design their firmware specifically for you. Keep in mind that these are general purpose devices for multiple activities and each user will have to adapt their needs to what tools are available and that not all people expect, want or have the same idea of how things should work. We all, myself included, tend to think in terms of our own limited scope instead of all possible uses. After all, the only thing a gps device is required to do is provide a position. All the other bits are added frills. That does not mean you should not make suggestions to Garmin for improvement.

    I own a different device, but a quick test indicates that when navigating a Track, the distances shown on the Active Route page are based on following the Track and are not straight line distances. If you wish to make a suggestion to Garmin that they include a time to point (not ETA) along with the distance for the Waypoints in this list go ahead. I think it would find general interest.

    However, using the distances on the Active Route page and your current speed you should be able to come up with a quick estimate in your head. If not, your device does have a calculator. It may not be the solution you desire, but what you ask for can be done. As to whether or not High and Low points would be used for ETA to Next, I cannot say.

    I strongly doubt that a Route is created when you navigate a Track. It is more likely that the Track is navigated as is, and Waypoints are found within a proximity value of the Track. How this is done, I cannot guess. I do not know if Garmin would divulge this information, but you can always ask.

    While Routes and Tracks are nothing more than a sequence of positions, they do have different limitations and expectations. Tracks can contain up to 10,000 points on most outdoor devices. Direct Routes are limited to 250 user points on mine, while Automated Routes (any Activity Profile other than Direct) are limited to 50 user points (the actual route will contain many more). Limitations on your device may differ. Automated Routes differ from Direct Routes in that they must follow routable features on a map (roads and, in some cases, trails).

    On my device, it is generally not possible to alter a Route that is not created on the Device (there are some exceptions). So for me it is no different than a Track.

    You do have control over what you put on your device. If 90 of your 100 pts are not of interest for the 12 hour hike, don’t load them. You can see which Waypoints will be included on the Active Route page simply by initiating navigation of the Track on your device while still at home. Multiple sd cards will allow further customization of what is available on the device while in the field.

    As far as cluttering up the map window, I do not believe individual Waypoints can be hidden. It is all or nothing and it is done by altering the zoom level for when they will appear thru the map set-up pages.