Via Points in BC vs 660

Former Member
Former Member
Hi Guys,
I just noticed something which may be normal but I thought I'd better ask. I'm going on a 12,600 mile bike trip and have created all the daily routes in BC. I started moving a few of them over to the 660. I was reviewing the routes in the GPS and noticed that the number of via points for a given route in the 660 is consistently less than in BC. As an example, I have one route that has 18 via points in BC but only reports 11 in the 660. When I compare the layout of the route in the 660 it looks the same as BC and the mileage is also the same so the route is probably fine. I also looked in my favorites and one of the via points as an example that is missing from the 660 route is there. Does anyone know what's going on and if its something to be concerned with or not? BTW, these are via points that are missing not shaping points.

Thanks,
Marc