Do I need a brand new workflow for 3.3.1?

Most of my routes were created in older versions of BC, using the method described below. They still work fine in the new BC and in my zumo 660. The problem is, when I try to create new routes using the old method, bad things happen.

Old method: create a temporary list so that the map is clean and uncluttered (the equivalent of a new "instance" of MapSource on a PC). Copy any needed waypoints into the temp list and use them to create a route. Create any new waypoints necessary to force the route and insert them as needed. Copy the route and paste it into an existing list based on how I organize data. So if it's a new route on Cape Cod, it goes into the Cape Cod list. Then I delete everything in Temp so it's ready for the next task.

Why that won't work any more: In BC 3.3.1, if I create a new route in Temp, all waypoints used in that route must remain in the temp folder. If I erase one, it gets removed from the route, no matter where I have copied the route to. If I copy all of the waypoints in Temp and move them with the route, that does not work either, once I erase them from Temp: it still wrecks the route.

Clearly I need to come up with a new workflow, but darned if I can figure out how to 1) start with a clean map, and 2) arrange routes in lists unless I create them in those lists from the get-go.

Thoughts, ideas, comments?

Thanks,

-dan
  • PS: As I "practiced" with this method, it became clear that it is vital that you delete the original route from Temp after moving it and prior to deleting any waypoints in Temp.


    Yes, I think the developers will fix the problem. I pretty sure the issue of deleting a waypoint removing the waypoint from the route if the route was in the list was not happening in previous versions. I think you noted in a previous post, it was not a problem before the last release.

    PS. after reading Dan Townsley post looks like it was a previous bug that was fixed and now popped back up.
  • Yup, a bug with nine lives [g].

    Thanks very much to everyone for helping me find a workaround.

    -dan
  • I don't think you should have to delete a route from a list before you can remove the waypoint from the list without removing the waypoint from the route. It would think it would be an easy code change to tell BC not to edit the route when the list changes. Am I missing something or is this a bug that will be fixed?

    Thanks