This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Venu vs Vivoactive vs Fenix5s

Hi all Garmin experts,

I would like to buy a watches to my GF and i would like to compare Venu vs Vivoactive vs Fenix5s.

Venu vs Vivoactive seems to be clear. Venu has AMOLED and because of that batterie dry faster. What surprised me i was in an official Garmin shop and a seller told me that you can better read display of Vivoactive watches on daily light compare with Venu. This seems to be a strange to me.

How Venu and Vivoactive compare with Fenix5s? What would be the reason to go for Fenix5s?

Thanks you in advance,

Oblack

Top Replies

All Replies

0 imagodespira over 4 years ago in reply to 3884043

I have no issues with the heart rate monitor. It works the same as in the Forerunner 245 and a bit better than in the Vivoactive 3 (especially in Weight + Cardio training -> no big drops and minutes of low pulse around 80 like on my VA3).

+1 mitchl over 4 years ago in reply to 3884043

Heart rate seems fine to me. Very similar numbers to the previous devices I've used.