thanks Tim. it would be nice to know exactly what it's doing... i see my 'live' HR well below the 'publicized' RHR for quite some time, but still no update to the RHR figure. Quite confusing given the additional inconsistency with GC.The daily number does not update, at least not if you're wearing your watch at night, in which case it seems that it is considering something like your average sleeping heart rate to be your RHR. If you don't wear it at night, it supposedly considers your RHR to be the lowest average over 1 minute. That's the best understanding we've been given so far. It is becoming more consistent, even if it is not a very good definition of RHR. Take a look at this discussion in which a Garmin moderator was responding to some of these questions:
And while we're on the topic of GC & HR data, how do you get the 735 to sync the daily HR data with GC? I thought just the act of 'being on GC' while having Bluetooth on would cause it to seamlessly sync, but it seems hours out of date. Even a manual 'sync now' via Garmin Express doesn't seem to update the daily HR screen... it often seems hours old, despite a manual sync.
Any ideas how to get it up to date?
How does the 735xt 'calculate' this? I thought it was simply the lowest HR reading of the day, during 'waking hours'? But I've gone a lot lower (c. 6bpm) intraday than a 'typical' RHR reading..does it have to stay there for a certain time before it 'registers' as a RHR, to avoid erroneous readings/dropouts registering as a daily RHR? What's it really doing under the bonnet?
I can't believe that they are still trying to reconcile the RHR values across the three platforms (Watch, Mobile, Web).
That said not sure any of the RHR values are that useful to me. My "manual" method of seeing what my HR drops to as I get out of bed is generally good enough for me.
Wouldn't it be awesome though if someone invented a device that automated this process, so it "just happened" automagically when you were wearing said device. And did it with a reasonable level of consistency and accuracy (and transparency).
I'd pay a lot of money for a device that had such a feature (amongst others) ... just a thought.