Power comparison with Vector 3 Pedals

No one is yelling at anyone, but suggesting that there is an imminent fix for a problem that hasn't been articulated except for the original problem (September 2019) is misleading to others reading this forum. Suggesting it's a "known issue" is just not accurate, and certainly hasn't been reported by Garmin / Tacx. There are an awful lot of very satisfied Neo 2T owners, and while I'm sorry that Shane's isn't among them, that's not quite the same as suggesting there is an overall issue.

My neo 2T drops my performance by 5 to 10% ... certainly I do a lot of workout because my home trainer is used for my real-life races. But it's unfortunate not to be able to simply calibrate. Some people seem to have less problems, it's good, but for someone who goes virtual race, it's a shame. Thank you for your attention

In ERG i find bigger discrepancy 10-12W across the range , thats 4% difference between  Neo2T and Power2Max Ng eco

In simulation is much better on 5min-1hour , but in 1 sec -5 sec there are big differences

Have you tested new 0.34 fw vs. power2max in erg mode?

Tested yesterday 200 and 250w. Nothing changed against previous fw.

not yet in ERG

This was in Zwift simulation after 0.34 update, maybe is on my head but I feel some nuances in how the ride is feeling (in better way)

Difference can be because of drive train(chain loss)

wish i could get results like that! this makes me believe there's a big number of units with hardware issues and not software issues at the moment.

I can wonder if the rest of the power meter are accurate , 4iii is left only for example

Although there might be a slight loss due to drive train inefficiency, given the means by which the Neo derives power, I would tend to place more dependence on the accuracy of the Tacx Neo's power output over any other powermeter!