power meter drift issues?

hey all,

unfortunately i've fallen into the power meter accuracy snake pit.

recently i've been seeing what looks to me like power meter drift. you
can see a pretty good example of this from my last trainerroad workout
here (done on a pre-2017 wahoo kickr snap):

https://analyze.dcrainmaker.com/#/public/ade655fb-936b-462b-6037-ef06a2775681

one power meter is a set of garmin vector 3 pedals with a claimed
accuracy of +/- 1.0%. (i've followed the service advisory notes for the
vector and verified the spindle torque. after installing the vectors i
reset the install angles and i also did a static torque test, as
described on the official garmin support pages, using a rice lake
calibrated 20 kg weight). the second power meter is a powertap g3 hub
with a claimed accuracy of +/- 1.5%. both power meters were calibrated
(zero'd) before the workout, which was done indoors at a consistent
temperature of around 70 F.

at the start of the ride, the powertap numbers are a few watts below the
vector numbers, which makes sense given some drivetrain power loss. but
by the end of the ride the power meters have reversed, with the powertap
giving numbers about 10% above the vector numbers, which seems wrong.
(aside from the drift, the difference between the two power values seems
out of spec for claimed accuracy of the devices, especially when you
consider that there should be some drivetrain power losses).

has anyone else seen something like this before? to me it seems like
one of the power meters is drifting out of spec? any ideas what else
might be going on or how to root cause the problem (short of buying
a tacx neo or a third power meter ;)?

cheers,
ed
Parents
  • I could start digging out all the old files - my GC files and the Neo files on Strava. Some Neo files are multiple files while Quarq is in one. So that would take quite a bit of digging and explaining.

    Honestly said; I have moved on. And I don't want to spend time on finding all the numbers again. You're gonna have to believe my numbers where right, which you can see in previous posts. Those figures are taken from the rides.

    Then you're gonna have to accept that some have issues with V3 while others don't. If yours work - well then great. Like I said, I also have consistent and comparable data now. So I can finally focus on riding - which is what I want to.

    I hope you understand.
Reply
  • I could start digging out all the old files - my GC files and the Neo files on Strava. Some Neo files are multiple files while Quarq is in one. So that would take quite a bit of digging and explaining.

    Honestly said; I have moved on. And I don't want to spend time on finding all the numbers again. You're gonna have to believe my numbers where right, which you can see in previous posts. Those figures are taken from the rides.

    Then you're gonna have to accept that some have issues with V3 while others don't. If yours work - well then great. Like I said, I also have consistent and comparable data now. So I can finally focus on riding - which is what I want to.

    I hope you understand.
Children
No Data