power meter drift issues?

hey all,

unfortunately i've fallen into the power meter accuracy snake pit.

recently i've been seeing what looks to me like power meter drift. you
can see a pretty good example of this from my last trainerroad workout
here (done on a pre-2017 wahoo kickr snap):

https://analyze.dcrainmaker.com/#/public/ade655fb-936b-462b-6037-ef06a2775681

one power meter is a set of garmin vector 3 pedals with a claimed
accuracy of +/- 1.0%. (i've followed the service advisory notes for the
vector and verified the spindle torque. after installing the vectors i
reset the install angles and i also did a static torque test, as
described on the official garmin support pages, using a rice lake
calibrated 20 kg weight). the second power meter is a powertap g3 hub
with a claimed accuracy of +/- 1.5%. both power meters were calibrated
(zero'd) before the workout, which was done indoors at a consistent
temperature of around 70 F.

at the start of the ride, the powertap numbers are a few watts below the
vector numbers, which makes sense given some drivetrain power loss. but
by the end of the ride the power meters have reversed, with the powertap
giving numbers about 10% above the vector numbers, which seems wrong.
(aside from the drift, the difference between the two power values seems
out of spec for claimed accuracy of the devices, especially when you
consider that there should be some drivetrain power losses).

has anyone else seen something like this before? to me it seems like
one of the power meters is drifting out of spec? any ideas what else
might be going on or how to root cause the problem (short of buying
a tacx neo or a third power meter ;)?

cheers,
ed
Parents
  • But that's also the thing Merchantofcool I just want to ride my bike, I just want enjoy my ridning. In fact I don't like spending hours on hours testing and writing about. So unfortunately, I will not do the test you wish for. Most particulaly because I changed my setup slightly to fit the Dura Ace pedals. But also because I just want ride my bike.

    So take it for what it is.

    I tiny note on the Quarq. I do see small differences in shorter sprints, but I suspect that to be due to the short time. Looking at the average on the whole; Neo and Quarq agree very well. On today's last hour (without interval) Neo was 186 and Quarq was 187... Or was it versa? Well nevermind... ;-)
Reply
  • But that's also the thing Merchantofcool I just want to ride my bike, I just want enjoy my ridning. In fact I don't like spending hours on hours testing and writing about. So unfortunately, I will not do the test you wish for. Most particulaly because I changed my setup slightly to fit the Dura Ace pedals. But also because I just want ride my bike.

    So take it for what it is.

    I tiny note on the Quarq. I do see small differences in shorter sprints, but I suspect that to be due to the short time. Looking at the average on the whole; Neo and Quarq agree very well. On today's last hour (without interval) Neo was 186 and Quarq was 187... Or was it versa? Well nevermind... ;-)
Children
No Data