This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Should I buy an Edge 830 or a Wahoo Roam

I have an Edge 1000 which I had shortly after it was released. It cost a kings ransom, but has proved to be a very poor investment. It promised many great features, but many of them have never worked reliably. For instance live track never works now, it sometimes worked in the past. I gave up with T by T instructions a long time ago as they were often too late for the junction. ..and the logic behind recalculate route if you swayed off the path was comical. Mostly it sent me home, even though I was only one hour into a six hour ride. Then there's the double pairing of Bluetooth, this always make me wince as Bluetooth connection is often dropped. How do Garmin get away with it?

Hopefully times have changed and software and hardware have moved on. I like the look of the 830, but I see recent firmware updates that make me nervous. Why do they need to provide fixes so that sensors are not dropped to this brand new device. Surely they must have this aspect of firmware development well and truly zipped up, after all it's not like this is the first Garmin device that has Ant+ and Bluetooth connectivity. 

So this is making me think it's time to look elsewhere. The Wahoo Roam looks like a good candidate to me, and from what I have read Wahoo are good at firmware and feature updates. I know in many instances they are playing catchup, but when many of the features in the Garmin world aren't reliable are Wahoo that far behind?

Since this is an 830 forum, I guess many people here will be flying the Garmin flag, but I would think a few would have asked themselves similar questions. I would be interested to know what swayed you to ignore a Wahoo and go with the 830?

  • I've owned the 800, 820 and now 830. The 830 is probably the first of all my Garmins that I finally look forward to using. Battery life is very, very good. Responsiveness is finally up to snuff. Screen refresh actually works, even with detailed maps. Lock-ups and reboots are rare and the widget functionality fills in a big hole that the previous devices had to fill.

    No, it's not perfect as you can see from this forum - I don't use ANT+ or other hardware and bluetooth is still a work in progress but I can live with that. In fact, I purchased the 830 with a great deal of trepidation but it has thankfully repaid my trust. This year is the big test with some transcontinental riding and large maps. The 830 will either be tossed into the Atlantic or come home with me. Just the sort of love/hate relationship that many Garmin Edge owners get used to. Slight smile

  • I had the Elemnt Roam and the Edge 530 and finally I stayed with the 530:

    My PRO's and CON's:

    Element Roam:

    + Configurable by app

    + On the fly komoot synchronisation

    + nice training workout screen

    + possibility to "zoom-in" the data screens 

    + maps are easy to read

    - GPS accuracy ok but weak in difficult conditions (buildings, tree cover...)

    - auto-backlight issues

    - very long boot-up time, and it takes even longer to get GPS signal and calibrate start height

    - start height cannot be set manually

    - no stand-by mode

    - no sunset data field

    - no bike profiles

    - you can only go forward when changing screen

    - no web platform like Garmin connect

    - no ANT+ light support (not possible to switch of the light of the Garmin Varia)

    - too expensive

    Edge 530:

    + quick

    + nice training metrics

    + overall the device looks nicer

    + nice screen (way better than my old Edge 1000)

    + great battery life

    + Garmin connect

    + GPS accuracy seems ok with the latest (beta) updates

    + Garmin IQ apps

    + Social media notifications (Whatsapp & co)

    - initial configuration via buttons is annoying

    - routing via adress only via ConnectIQ (not for Edge 830)

    - no native way to load new routes without ending a running activity (only via ConnectIQ widgets)

    - workout screen is not configurable, you have to create you own

    - maps are sometimes oveloaded with details which makes it difficult so read

  • I've had 2 Garmin 820's (first one battery failed just outside of warranty) and the replacement is at the stage where I'm struggling to record a 5 hour ride. I take a USB stick for mid-ride charge. I'm facing the Garmin/Wahoo dilemna, I really don't want to be stuffed again by Garmin.

    Problems I have with the 820:

    Very flaky WiFi and Bluetooth connection, I can sit with phone next to Garmin and it wont connect to phone or router 1m away even though they are all paired up and have connected many times.

    Screen sensitivity still poor after all the software updates, takes 2 or three touches to get it to react, often 5 to power it off, raindrops still change screen or category.

    The "recalculating route" feature? is pathetically implemented and seems to be a real battery drainer

    Power management, to avoid running out of battery I ride with GPS only, and wifi and bluetooth switched off while riding, shortest screen illumination. So I'm not getting many of the benefits the 820 is supposed to provide

    I'm invested into the Garmin ecosystem Garmin Connect and other Garmin devices but I just don't want to be stuffed again by Garmin.

    Anyone else coming from the same place can comment please

  • If you use it in conjunction with another Garmin device, just be aware of that as a cyclist you are not supposed to get intensy minutes. It does not support that . Otherwise, it’s a nice device, but i find the physio trueup a little unprecise.