This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

GPS Accuracy

Former Member
Former Member
So it begins.

I will have mine Fenix 5 on Saturday and will start doing comparisons to an Ambit 3 Peak. I don't have an F3 to directly compare to as of now.

Anyone have an F3 and F5 to compare?
  • Former Member
    0 Former Member over 8 years ago
    The GPS + GLONASS doesn't improve accuracy, it only helps you get a quicker GPS acquisition and hold on to a satellite lock when there is a limited view of the sky. The watches only calculate position from the signals of three satellites and there are 12 GPS and 12 GLONASS satellites in each hemisphere.

    The tracks on your map with GPS and GPS + GLONASS show that you are using Smart Data Recording. To improve your accuracy, you should change that setting to Every Second.


    Will this affect the Battery Life?

    Tim
  • It is incorrect that position is only calculated from 3 satellites.
    For a 2D fix 3 satellites are required, this wouldn't give altitude information.
    For a 3D fix minimum of 4 satellites are required.
    With the number of satellites the accuracy increases, according to specs Mediatek chip is able to handle 66 satellites.
    At the moment there are ~ 30 GPS and ~ 25 Glonass satellites in orbit, but not all of them are visible at the same time.
    Glonass does increase accuracy under certain circumstances when there are to few GPS satellites in view or not well spread over the orbit.
    This is mainly in areas with limited view to the sky. (high raise buildings, valleys)
    I life in an area where I can clearly see an improvement in accuracy by using Glonass, but I can't speak for areas with good coverage of GPS only satellites.
    1" recording shouldn't have impact to battery life, but Glonass has.
  • the GPS chip Mediatek is the same of Fenix 3 ?
  • the GPS chip Mediatek is the same of Fenix 3 ?


    Don't know, but very likely as the MT3333 still seems to be the actual chip supporting GPS/GLONASS
  • Fenix 5 vs Forerunner 630

    F5 on left arm
    630 on right arm

    http://www.mygpsfiles.com/app/#7i0VBm7v
  • I am having significant issues with GPS accuracy - two photos attached. The bottom one was in Chicago when I first got my F5. It was an out and back run - the lines should be on top of each other. The top one was a hike in Zions NP and the accuracy is so far off that you cannot even use the data. Not sure what to do - I have yet to call Garmin on it - but I am finding that any time there is not 180 degrees of full sky view the GPS is not even usable.

    Thoughts? ciq.forums.garmin.com/.../1229331.png
  • That's rough. Do you have any good tracks, or are they all equally bad?

    I'm doing a weekend hike this weekend in the Adirondack high peaks. This will be the first real hiking test for my F5. I'll post back with results.
  • I'm doing a weekend hike this weekend in the Adirondack high peaks. This will be the first real hiking test for my F5. I'll post back with results.


    Could you please check the barometric altimeter's accuracy as well during your hike?
    I am experiencing constant drift in the barometric altimeter, compared to the altitude the GPS displays (which is very accurate in open areas)
    I know that this is expected due to pressure change, but in my case I see the altimeter drifting quickly in the first 10 to 30 minutes after calibration
    I have created a thread so that people email garmin to add continuous altimeter calibration
    https://forums.garmin.com/forum/on-t...us-calibration
  • That's rough. Do you have any good tracks, or are they all equally bad?

    I'm doing a weekend hike this weekend in the Adirondack high peaks. This will be the first real hiking test for my F5. I'll post back with results.


    Scottj2, I have some good ones - but those are only the ones where there is absolutely nothing blocking the sky. I decided to reset the watch to see if that helps at all. Will report back.