Same opinion here. I resorted to the lap trick too, but it's really a dumb hack. Seems like elapsed time would be the most common field for this feature.
Agreed 100% - I'd really like to know how I'm doing toward a goal.
First off, I pointed out that I'm using the 130 to let Garmin know that users of other models -- not just the 520 -- care about this missing feature. And, secondly, the 130 also already shows how far you…
Same opinion here. I resorted to the lap trick too, but it's really a dumb hack. Seems like elapsed time would be the most common field for this feature.
I'd also like (and expect) to be able to see the elapsed time for the segment effort. I *know* the device has that value handy. It needs it to calculate how much you are ahead or behind your best position for the segment. So... why not let us just display the damn value already? (FYI, I am using the Garmin Edge 130.)
You are using Edge 130. First off, why are you commenting here then since it obvious you dunno what 520 is capable of. And secondly, 520 DOES show how much you are ahead or behind your best position for the segment. Emphasis on your best position meaning Personal Record.
However this topic is about Elapsed time on live segments regardless of PR or KOM.
First off, I pointed out that I'm using the 130 to let Garmin know that users of other models -- not just the 520 -- care about this missing feature. And, secondly, the 130 also already shows how far you are ahead/behind of your best position. Not sure why you focused on something that I already acknowledged was there. As you noted at the end, yes, this topic *is* about the missing Elapsed Time data. It's missing, and it shouldn't be. Carry on.