The relevance of course type

Until recently  I had always paid an attention in GC or in GCM to select the real course type. So when I knew I would go for a ride, a run or a hike, I opted for cycling, run and hiking as course types of the courses in question. I even tried to forecast whether I would use run or trail run app in case of running activities following a course.

Yesterday I drew some courses knowing that these courses were too long  to run along. So it can happen that I would walk/hike more than run.

I wondered whether there is any relevance of the course type apart from the fact that if you use course type you can use it as a filter when searching. So is there any other effects to courses being navigated by a Fenix watch?

Just to make it clear: I tested some, I created Course A, B, and C, and to them I assigned the types of run, trail run, hiking, respectively, and all of the three courses were visible on my watch, independently from which app type I used, run, trail run, walk, hike.

So course type has no efffects on which courses are offered when starting a sports app.

  • Hi,

    I have a F7Xss now Nerd

    Like you, i do not find any information about watch Activity and Garmin Connect course type relationship,

    ---

    My understanding about course type, which is very important to take care about the rules (permit/deny ways) by activity type !

    • First - you can run/trail/hike a bike course type and vice-versa
      • Garmin on the watch, today yes, doesn't filtered courses by type depending on which activity is selected
        • Funny because i do not take attention to that, but by habits named my courses starting with
          • T = Trail
          • R = Run
          • B = Bike

    • Second - if you create a bike course type, then Garmin Connect should avoid you to draw over some roads/trails
      I personaly use Plotaroute 
      • Private raods/trails for all activity type
      • Forbidden roads/trails for this specific type of activity

    ---

    https://blog.utagawavtt.com/fr/blog/carte-gps-vtt-gratuite

    https://maps.utagawavtt.com/garmin/

    • Les reliefs ombragés et les lignes de niveaux,
    • Les artefacts utiles pour le VTT ou l'itinérance (parkings, gares, sommets, cols, gués, magasins de vélo, points d'eau),
    • Les chemins et sentiers sont mis en avant versus les routes importantes et autoroutes,
    • Les remontées mécaniques Mountain cableway,
    • Les sentiers interdits ou non praticables à VTT (en rouge) X,
    • Les zones de biodiversité Bee où le VTT est interdit totalement (en rouge) ou partiellement (en violet).
    • Shaded relief and contour lines,
    • Artifacts useful for mountain biking or touring (parking lots, stations, peaks, passes, fords, bike stores, water points),
    • Roads and trails are highlighted, as opposed to major roads and freeways,
    • Mountain cableways,
    • Trails prohibited or not suitable for mountain bikes (in red) X,
    •  Bee biodiversity zones where mountain biking is totally (red) or partially (purple) prohibited.
  • Thx for your answer.  Sorry, I did not emphasize that I never use auto draw, I always manually draw the courses, typically in Mapsourse. But during the import process I am also asked to use a course type. so I wondered why it was so important to classify my manually drawn course.

    Based on your answer I am more and more sure that it makes no difference what course type I choose in case of manually drawn courses.

    Apart from any filtering in GC, which I have never used.

  • it makes no difference what course type I choose in case of manually drawn courses.

    Apart from any filtering in GC, which I have never used.

    Maybe any change happened since starting this thread.

    Is there anyone who can contribute?